Korte-Fusco Joint Venture
Korte-Fusco Joint Venture appealed a delay claim against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding a construction project. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment, finding ambiguity in a modification related to the claim.
Material Facts
- On 31 August 2011, a contracting officer executed a contract with Korte-Fusco Joint Venture for a construction project.
- Due to a bid protest, the notice to proceed was issued on 29 November 2011.
- Korte-Fusco Joint Venture entered into a subcontract with NCI-CT, Inc. for work on 16 May 2012.
- The Corps did not approve the retaining walls until 9 July 2013, more than 13 months after the initial submittal.
- On 21 August 2013, a 'Red Zone' meeting was held to discuss the closeout process.
- On 13 September 2013, Korte-Fusco Joint Venture and the contracting officer executed bilateral Modification No. A00004, extending the time for contract completion by 72 days.
- On 12 May 2014, Korte-Fusco Joint Venture submitted a certified claim seeking $1,971,209.19 and a 389-day time extension.
Parties
- Appellant
- Korte-Fusco Joint Venture
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Contracting Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville
- Contract Number
- W912QR-11-C-0037
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63627, 63647, 63656, 63657, 63658June 10, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63603June 9, 2026
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63420May 11, 2026
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Marine Hydraulics International, LLCNo. 63429, 63511August 6, 2026