59767

Korte-Fusco Joint Venture

November 5, 2015Judge O'Connell
Denied / Government PrevailedDelay / Disruption / SuspensionAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Korte-Fusco Joint Venture appealed a delay claim against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding a construction project. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment, finding ambiguity in a modification related to the claim.

Material Facts

  • On 31 August 2011, a contracting officer executed a contract with Korte-Fusco Joint Venture for a construction project.
  • Due to a bid protest, the notice to proceed was issued on 29 November 2011.
  • Korte-Fusco Joint Venture entered into a subcontract with NCI-CT, Inc. for work on 16 May 2012.
  • The Corps did not approve the retaining walls until 9 July 2013, more than 13 months after the initial submittal.
  • On 21 August 2013, a 'Red Zone' meeting was held to discuss the closeout process.
  • On 13 September 2013, Korte-Fusco Joint Venture and the contracting officer executed bilateral Modification No. A00004, extending the time for contract completion by 72 days.
  • On 12 May 2014, Korte-Fusco Joint Venture submitted a certified claim seeking $1,971,209.19 and a 389-day time extension.

Parties

Appellant
Korte-Fusco Joint Venture
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville
Contract Number
W912QR-11-C-0037
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.